Kelly Osborne has criticized Harry and Megan Markle’s recent appearances at California wildfire sites, accusing them of turning tragedy into disaster tourism.

The couple’s presence has caused debate about the fine line between genuine humanitarian efforts and publicity.

The couple’s visits to fire-affected areas have raised questions about the authenticity of their outreach, with critics questioning the timing of their appearances and the potential for dramatic footage for future projects.

The controversy has reignited broader discussions about the couple’s approach to public service post-Royal life since their dramatic exit from the British royal family. Critics argue that Harry and Megan have consistently sought to maximize their humanitarian efforts, turning good deeds into content for their various media deals.

Royal commentators have noted the stark contrast between their approach and that of working Royals like Princess Anne who has spent decades doing charitable work with minimal publicity.

The backlash on social media has been particularly fierce, with users creating viral memes juxtaposing the couple’s polished appearances with the raw devastation surrounding them. Supporters of the couple argue that their presence helps maintain media attention on the disaster and potentially increases aid to affected areas.

However, reports have surfaced that several charities and relief organizations confirmed they received no direct support or donations from the couple during their visits.

The controversy has also highlighted the changing nature of celebrity involvement in natural disasters, with the social media age creating new pressures and opportunities for public figures to showcase their charitable works as California continues to battle the wildfires.

Megan Duchess of Sussex, a famous face, has been accused of transforming the devastation of others into her own personal platform, with critics lambasting her for using the misfortune of others to bolster her own public image.