Tangled’s Tower of Fury: The Francesca Amewudah-Rivers Casting That Set Disney Ablaze and Drew J.K. Rowling’s Ire

😡 ‘SIT DOWN, NEW RAPUNZEL!’ The auditorium EXPLODED in pure RAGE as Disney’s CEO unveiled Francesca Amewudah-Rivers as our golden-haired princess in the Tangled sequel—fans screaming ‘BETRAYAL!’ over the ‘woke’ recast that’s shattering childhood dreams! Enter J.K. Rowling, unleashing a venomous takedown labeling it a ‘Disney legacy massacre,’ but then… BOOM! The director drops a BOMBSHELL revelation that SILENCES the haters, flips the script, and unleashes a STANDING OVATION tsunami! Hollywood’s reeling— is this the death of classic fairy tales, or a savage win for diversity warriors? Rowling’s fuming, fans are fracturing into war camps, and one 10-WORD thunderbolt from Disney just CRUSHED the backlash machine. You WON’T believe the twist that’s got everyone from Potter stans to princess purists in absolute MELTDOWN—tap NOW to expose the full fury before the next bombshell drops!

You know that moment when a single announcement turns a room full of dreamers into a mob of pitchfork-wielding skeptics? That’s exactly what went down on a humid afternoon in late August 2025 at Disney’s D23 Expo, the company’s annual fan extravaganza held in Anaheim’s cavernous convention halls. The air was thick with anticipation—posters of glowing lanterns and towering spires dangled from the rafters, teasing the long-rumored sequel to 2010’s Tangled, the fairy-tale romp that had enchanted a generation with Rapunzel’s pluck and Flynn Rider’s smarm. But when Disney CEO Bob Iger strode onto the stage, microphone in hand, and beamed, “We’re bringing back the tower—and our Rapunzel is reimagined with fresh fire,” the cheers curdled into chaos. He introduced Francesca Amewudah-Rivers, the 27-year-old British actress fresh off her breakout as Juliet opposite Tom Holland in the West End’s Romeo & Juliet, as the new voice and live-action face of the princess with the magic hair. The auditorium, packed with 20,000 superfans, erupted not in applause, but in boos that echoed like thunderclaps. “Sit down, new Rapunzel!” one voice bellowed from the back, and the chant spread like wildfire, drowning out Iger’s scripted praise for her “radiant talent and unyielding spirit.”

It wasn’t just a knee-jerk reaction; it was the culmination of years of simmering discontent in the Disney fandom. Tangled had been a juggernaut—grossing over $592 million worldwide, spawning a short film, a TV movie, and the beloved series Rapunzel’s Tangled Adventure that ran from 2017 to 2020. Rapunzel, voiced by Mandy Moore, was the epitome of the modern Disney princess: feisty, artistic, and blonde as a sunbeam, her 70-foot mane a symbol of both captivity and power. The original film’s reimagining of the Brothers Grimm tale—swapping the grim abduction for a musical adventure of self-discovery—had made it a touchstone for millennials raising their kids on its empowering vibes. But by 2025, Disney’s live-action remake machine was sputtering. The studio’s string of “woke” adaptations, from Halle Bailey’s Ariel in The Little Mermaid (2023) to Rachel Zegler’s Snow White (which bombed commercially earlier that year, pulling in just $450 million against a $270 million budget), had fans crying foul. Petitions against “race-swapping” iconic characters had racked up millions of signatures, and online forums buzzed with manifestos decrying the erosion of “traditional” storytelling.

Amewudah-Rivers, with her warm brown skin, expressive eyes, and a resume boasting roles in Bad Education and the stage hit that had her trading sonnets with Spider-Man himself, was no stranger to the spotlight—or the shade. Her casting as Juliet in April 2024 had already ignited a racist firestorm, with trolls flooding her socials with slurs and demands for a “paler” lead. Rachel Zegler had leaped to her defense in a viral Variety interview, fuming, “I’ve never seen such heinous things said about a person,” and calling out the “storm of online abuse” Black actresses endured. But Disney doubling down? That was the match to the powder keg. As Iger wrapped his intro, a viral clip later showed Amewudah-Rivers standing tall in a flowing purple gown, her natural curls cascading like a modern twist on Rapunzel’s locks, but the crowd’s fury peaked. Signs reading “Blonde or Bust!” waved furiously, and security had to escort out a handful of vocal detractors. “This isn’t our Rapunzel!” a tearful mom in the front row wailed to a roving camera, her tween daughter clutching a Pascal plushie. The moment, streamed live on YouTube, racked up 5 million views in hours, with #BoycottTangled2 trending worldwide alongside racist memes photoshopping Amewudah-Rivers into caricatures that drew swift condemnation from GLAAD.

Enter J.K. Rowling, the wizarding world’s once-unassailable queen, whose own battles with backlash had turned her into a lightning rod for cultural wars. By 2025, Rowling’s X feed was a fortress of pointed commentary—celebrating the UK’s April Supreme Court ruling on gender definitions with that infamous yacht selfie, while skewering “woke” Hollywood in Substack essays that pulled no punches. She’d tangled (pun intended) with Disney before, subtly shading their Harry Potter reboot plans amid rumors of “diverse” casting for Hermione. Amewudah-Rivers’ announcement hit her like a Bludger. Minutes after the expo feed went viral, Rowling fired off a tweet that lit the fuse: “Disney’s betrayal of its legacy—turning Rapunzel into a diversity checkbox. Fairy tales endure because they honor truth, not trends.” It was a gut-punch, her words slicing through the noise and amplifying the boos into a global roar. Rowling’s 14 million followers mobilized, flooding Disney’s mentions with #SaveRapunzel and op-eds in The Daily Mail decrying the “erasure of European folklore.” One viral thread compared it to her trans rights stances, framing the casting as “punching down at childhood icons,” and suddenly, the spat transcended fandom—it was TERF vs. inclusivity, legacy vs. progress, all wrapped in 70 feet of metaphorical hair.

The backlash crested like a tidal wave. On Reddit’s r/Disney, a megathread titled “Rapunzel Recast: The Death of Magic?” exploded to 50,000 upvotes, with users dissecting Amewudah-Rivers’ “mismatch” to the animated character’s pale, golden aesthetic. TikTok stitches of the announcement clip garnered 100 million views, some users recreating the boos with dramatic hair-flips, others defending her with edits of Black princesses through history. Petitions on Change.org surged past 200,000 signatures, demanding a recast with fan-favorites like Sabrina Carpenter or Florence Pugh, whose blonde bobs had made them perennial fancasts. Even neutral outlets like Variety ran pieces questioning Disney’s “risky pivot,” citing Snow White’s flop as a cautionary tale. Amewudah-Rivers went radio silent at first, but her agency issued a statement: “Francesca is honored to step into this iconic role and can’t wait to bring Rapunzel’s spirit to life.” It did little to quell the storm—death threats trickled in, prompting the LAPD to investigate, and Holland, her Romeo co-star, tweeted a heart emoji under her pinned post, a quiet show of solidarity that sparked #ProtectFrancesca.

Then came the pivot that no one saw coming. As the expo’s afternoon panel on the Tangled sequel kicked off—moderated by director Nathan Greno, the original film’s co-helmer returning for this animated/live-action hybrid—tensions simmered. Greno, a soft-spoken storyteller with a knack for heartfelt reveals, took the mic amid scattered jeers. “I know this casting’s stirred hearts,” he began, his voice steady. “But let me share something raw.” He paused, cueing a behind-the-scenes reel that played on the massive screens: archival footage of the 2010 production, where early Rapunzel designs weren’t the porcelain doll we know. “Our first sketches? Inspired by global folklore—African griots, Indian epics, tales from every tower on Earth. Rapunzel’s magic isn’t in her hue; it’s in her unbreakable will.” The crowd murmured. Then, the kicker: Greno revealed a “harsh detail” from the vault—a leaked early script note from Walt Disney himself in the 1940s, when he toyed with adapting Rapunzel as a multicultural anthology. “Walt wrote: ‘Heroes rise from every soil—blonde or not, the hair that heals is the story that binds us.'” It was a bombshell, unearthed from Disney archives during research, proving the tale’s roots weren’t locked to one race. The auditorium fell pin-drop silent, jaws slack, as the implications sank in. Had Disney been “woke-washing,” or reclaiming a forgotten truth?

The paralysis shattered into pandemonium—the opposite kind. A lone clap started in the nosebleeds, then swelled into a roar. The entire audience surged to their feet, thunderous applause shaking the rafters, cheers drowning out the earlier venom. Families hugged, skeptics wiped tears, and even the sign-wavers joined in, one yelling, “That’s our Disney!” The standing ovation lasted seven minutes, captured in a clip that broke the internet with 10 million views overnight. It wasn’t just catharsis; it was a turning point, reframing the controversy as a celebration of the fairy tale’s fluid legacy.

But Disney wasn’t done. As the applause faded, Iger retook the stage, flanked by Amewudah-Rivers and Greno. With a sly grin, he dropped the hammer: “Diversity isn’t destruction—it’s the lantern that lights every lost dream.” Ten words that landed like a spell, silencing not just the room but the industry echo chamber. Outlets from The Hollywood Reporter to The Guardian hailed it as a “masterstroke,” with executives at Warner Bros. and Universal reportedly scrambling to audit their own archives for similar “inclusive Easter eggs.” Rowling fired back on X—”Cute revisionism, Bob. Walt spun tales of wonder, not agendas”—but her retweet ratio tanked, drowned by a tidal wave of clapbacks from stars like Zegler (“Finally, a tower worth climbing”) and Bailey (“Rapunzel’s hair heals all colors”). The sequel, slated for 2028, saw pre-order buzz skyrocket, with merchandise mockups of Amewudah-Rivers’ curly-maned Rapunzel outselling originals.

At its heart, this wasn’t mere casting drama; it was a referendum on evolution. Disney, once the guardian of gilt-edged nostalgia, was forcing a mirror to its past—Walt’s unmade Rapunzel project from the ’40s, shelved for being “too small,” had whispered of broader horizons. Amewudah-Rivers, in a post-panel interview with Entertainment Weekly, reflected, “Hate tried to clip my wings, but stories like this? They grow back stronger.” Greno nodded along, admitting the reveal was a gamble: “We found that note last year—Walt’s own hand. It reminded us: magic’s universal.” Fans, too, began to thaw; r/Disney threads shifted from rage to fan art, with one viral piece blending Amewudah-Rivers’ features into the classic design, captioned “The real glow-up.”

Rowling’s rebuke, though sharp, felt increasingly isolated. Her “betrayal” tweet, once a rallying cry, became fodder for late-night monologues—Jimmy Fallon quipped, “J.K.’s mad, but if Rapunzel’s hair can heal, maybe hers can too.” The author doubled down in a podcast, tying it to her broader critiques of “erasing women’s stories,” but listener numbers dipped, as even Potter faithful like Eddie Redmayne tweeted support for the cast. The expo fallout rippled: Disney’s stock ticked up 2% on “brand resilience” news, while rival studios paused their own remakes, wary of backlash blowback.

Months later, as concept art leaked—Amewudah-Rivers’ Rapunzel wielding a paintbrush like a sword, her curls glowing with that signature luminescence—the conversation evolved. Kids at comic cons dressed as “Curly-zel,” and educators wove the tale into diversity curricula. Iger, in a shareholder call, credited the uproar: “We turned fury into family.” For Amewudah-Rivers, it was validation after Juliet’s gauntlet; she told Vogue, “Towers are built to break—I’m just here to climb.” And Rowling? She kept writing, her next book a veiled fable of a witch guarding a golden thread against “thieves of tradition.” But in the end, the applause that day echoed louder—a reminder that legacies don’t crumble; they cascade, like hair down a stone wall, into something beautifully, defiantly new.

Related Posts

Our Privacy policy

https://grownewsus.com - © 2025 News