🚨 BREAKING: Supergirl’s Future Just Took a NOSE DIVE – Insiders Are Calling It a TOTAL BOMB 😱💥

DC fans, brace yourselves… word from deep inside Warner Bros. is leaking out, and it’s NOT good for James Gunn’s big DCU swing.

Multiple sources are whispering that early test screenings for Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow went DOWN IN FLAMES. We’re talking mixed-to-bad reactions, an “underwhelming” villain who’s apparently a total snooze, uneven pacing that drags, and ZERO real excitement from audiences. Milly Alcock gets some praise for stepping up as Kara, but even that’s not saving the day. Lobo’s role? Barely two fights. The bad guys? Dark twists that have some calling it divisive or straight-up off-putting.

After Superman already struggled overseas and the DCU is fighting for traction, is THIS the movie that sinks the whole reboot? Reshoots rumors, ballooning budget whispers past $200M, and one co-star facing jail time… the red flags are piling up FAST.

Full scoop:

As the DC Universe under James Gunn and Peter Safran continues its rocky rollout, fresh reports are emerging about the upcoming Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow, with multiple insiders claiming early test screenings have not gone well. Set for release on June 26, 2026, the film stars Milly Alcock as Kara Zor-El and is directed by Craig Gillespie from a script by Ana Nogueira, drawing inspiration from the Tom King comic series.

Sources close to production have described the screenings as underwhelming at best, with complaints centering on pacing issues, a forgettable villain, and a lack of overall excitement. One recurring point: the antagonist—reportedly a major departure from the comic’s Krem of the Yellow Hills—is portrayed as part of a group of “losers” involved in dark, potentially divisive elements like kidnapping for exploitation. While Alcock has received some positive nods for her performance, the feedback suggests the film has struggled to capture the energy needed for a major superhero tentpole.

These leaks arrive at a precarious time for the DCU. Gunn’s Superman, released last summer, delivered solid domestic numbers but underperformed internationally, leaving questions about the franchise’s global appeal. With Supergirl positioned as the next major theatrical entry—following animated projects and series like Creature Commandos and Peacemaker Season 2—the pressure is on to prove the rebooted universe can deliver consistent hits.

Production on Supergirl wrapped principal photography in 2025, with reshoots reportedly underway to address concerns. Budget estimates have climbed, with some outlets suggesting figures north of $200 million when marketing is factored in. Adding to the uncertainty, co-star Matthias Schoenaerts faced legal issues, including a reported six-month prison sentence unrelated to the film, though his role remains in place.

The film’s tone leans into a darker, more cosmic revenge story than traditional Supergirl portrayals. Kara teams with young Ruthye Marye Knoll (Eve Ridley) on a galaxy-spanning quest after personal tragedy. Jason Momoa appears as Lobo in a supporting capacity—fans noted his quick wrap on set raised eyebrows about limited screen time. David Krumholtz, Emily Beecham, and others round out the cast.

Gunn has remained upbeat publicly. In September 2025, he called Alcock “maybe the best bit of casting I’ve ever done,” describing her work as “absolutely stunning” during editing. He has emphasized that each DCU project will have its own distinct voice, with Supergirl positioned as a full space fantasy separate from Superman‘s style. At various press events, Gunn stressed no “house style” exists—directors like Gillespie bring unique sensibilities to avoid repetition.

Yet online chatter has turned skeptical. YouTube channels and social media accounts have amplified the test-screening rumors, with titles like “Supergirl Test Screenings Are a DISASTER” gaining traction. Some fans express concern over the villain changes, viewing them as too grim or mismatched with Supergirl’s hopeful legacy. Others worry the film’s darker elements—exploring trauma from Krypton’s destruction—might alienate audiences seeking lighter fare.

This isn’t the first time a DC project has faced pre-release turbulence. The previous DCEU saw similar leaks and backlash, from Batman v Superman to Justice League. Gunn and Safran promised a more cohesive, creator-driven approach when taking over DC Studios in 2022, prioritizing quality over rushed interconnected stories. So far, Creature Commandos earned praise, but theatrical results remain the true test.

The trailer, released late 2025, showcased Alcock in her suit alongside Lobo and cosmic action, drawing comparisons to Gunn’s Guardians of the Galaxy—irreverent humor in space. Critics noted the aesthetic feels familiar, raising questions about whether the DCU risks blending into MCU-like territory despite vows of variety.

Fan reactions split sharply. Supporters point to Alcock’s House of the Dragon pedigree and Gunn’s track record, arguing early negativity is typical Hollywood whisper campaigns. Detractors cite the franchise’s history of underdelivering, fearing another costly misfire could stall momentum for upcoming projects like Lanterns, Clayface, and a potential Batman film.

Industry watchers note superhero fatigue plays a role. Post-Avengers: Endgame, audiences have grown pickier, with recent Marvel and DC entries facing mixed results. Supergirl‘s June slot pits it against summer competition, where blockbusters live or die by opening weekend buzz.

If the reports hold, reshoots could refine the film before its IMAX and theatrical rollout. Gunn has a history of course-correcting—Guardians and The Suicide Squad overcame early doubts. But with the DCU still proving itself, a weak Supergirl could amplify calls for reevaluation.

For now, the studio remains silent on specifics, letting marketing build anticipation. Alcock’s Kara is pitched as a flawed, complex hero—messy in ways male counterparts have long been allowed. Whether that resonates or repels will decide if Woman of Tomorrow soars or crashes.

As one industry source put it: “Test screenings are snapshots, not verdicts. But in today’s market, you don’t get many second chances.”