🚨 NEW UPDATE IN AIR INDIA 171 CRASH! 🚨
Chilling new evidence has emerged from the Air India 171 crash investigation! 😱 Did the computer override human control at the worst possible moment?
The most shocking possibility has been revealed: Automated systems may have taken control during the critical takeoff phase, leaving the pilots powerless when disaster struck. 💥
This disturbing discovery raises serious questions about pilot control vs. automation in modern aviation. Click below to uncover the shocking truth behind what really happened! 👇
New Updates on Air India Flight 171 – New Evidence Reveals a Chilling Possibility: Did the Computer Override Human Control at the Worst Possible Moment?
The investigation into the tragic crash of Air India Flight 171 has just taken an even darker turn. After months of thorough examination of the black box data and additional evidence recovered from the wreckage, new revelations have come to light. It now appears that a chilling possibility may have contributed to the catastrophic failure: the computer systems might have overridden human control at the worst possible moment.
The incident, which occurred on 12 June 2025, killed 230 passengers and 12 crew members and tragically took the lives of 19 people on the ground. Initial reports indicated a loss of engine thrust and power failure shortly after takeoff, but the deeper investigation now suggests that the issue wasn’t purely mechanical—automation systems might have been the key factor in the crash.
This new discovery raises serious questions about the balance between automated systems and human control in modern aircraft, especially during critical flight phases like takeoff, where human intervention is crucial for success. So, what did the investigators uncover, and how does it challenge our understanding of what happened on that fateful day?
The Crash: What Happened to Air India Flight 171?
On 12 June 2025, Air India Flight 171, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, took off from Ahmedabad Airport in India, bound for London Gatwick Airport. The aircraft, carrying 230 passengers and 12 crew members, was initially cleared for takeoff and was climbing steadily when, within 30 seconds, the crew reported a loss of power and thrust.
As the aircraft continued to descend, the flight crew issued a mayday call, but despite their efforts to regain control, the aircraft crashed into a residential area near the airport. The crash caused multiple explosions and left a massive fire in its wake. Investigators initially suspected a hydraulic issue or engine malfunction, but the cause of the crash remained unclear until further evidence was uncovered.
The New Revelation: Did the Computer Override Human Control?
Months into the investigation, scientists and aviation experts studying the black box data made a shocking discovery: there was evidence to suggest that the aircraft’s automated systems may have overridden the pilots’ commands during the critical moments after takeoff.
The black box data showed that as the engines lost power, the engine control systems, which are designed to automatically adjust thrust during takeoff, may have been triggered to take control of the aircraft’s power settings. However, during this crucial phase, the system seems to have malfunctioned, causing the engines to remain at idle, despite the pilots’ attempts to increase thrust manually.
According to the new findings, the autopilot systems—which are typically used during the cruise phase—could have engaged earlier than intended, taking away the pilots’ ability to manually adjust the engines and recover from the failure. While automation is designed to help pilots manage routine flight phases, it appears that in this case, the automation system was not responsive to the unique situation the aircraft was facing.
“This is a chilling possibility,” said one of the aviation experts involved in the investigation. “The automation system, which was supposed to assist in normal operations, may have actually locked out the pilots during the most critical phase of the flight. If the computer had overridden the pilot’s attempts to regain control, it could explain why they were unable to recover in time.”
The Role of Automation in Modern Aircraft
Modern aircraft are heavily reliant on automation systems, which are responsible for many critical functions, from engine power management to autopilot functions during flight. These systems have been designed to improve efficiency and reduce pilot workload during routine flight phases. However, they also introduce new complexities, especially when something goes wrong during a critical phase like takeoff.
The fact that both engines failed to generate thrust shortly after takeoff may have caused the aircraft to enter a stall-like condition, where the pilots would normally need to quickly adjust the thrust to recover. However, the automated systems may have prevented the pilots from reacting fast enough. This loss of control could have been the key factor in the crash.
“We’ve always known that automation can help improve flight safety and efficiency,” said an industry safety consultant. “But what we’re seeing in this case is that the automation systems failed to respond appropriately to the emergency. The system overrode the pilot’s ability to regain control at a critical moment, and that could have been the fatal mistake.”
What Was the Trigger for the Automation Failure?
So, why did this happen? Why did the automation systems take control during the critical moments when they were supposed to be managed by the pilots?
The exact cause of the automation failure is still under investigation, but early findings suggest that it could be linked to a glitch or malfunction in the software that governs the engine’s thrust control. Aircraft engines are equipped with automatic thrust management systems that adjust power levels based on the aircraft’s altitude, speed, and pitch. However, in this case, these systems were not able to adjust the engines’ thrust when the aircraft began to lose power, and instead, they went into idle mode, rendering the engines powerless.
Additionally, experts believe that the pilot’s inputs may have been blocked or overridden by the automated system when they tried to manually increase engine power. This type of human-computer conflict is not uncommon in modern aviation, but it has never been observed on this scale before.
“When the pilots attempted to take manual control, it seems the system had already locked them out,” explained one investigator. “It’s as if the autopilot was engaged before the pilots could take full control of the aircraft, and it just didn’t respond to their inputs.”
What This Means for Aviation Safety
The findings regarding the automation failure in Air India Flight 171 are deeply concerning and will likely have significant implications for the future of aviation safety. The aviation community will need to reconsider the balance between automated systems and human control, especially during critical phases like takeoff.
Pilot Training and Response to Automation Failures:
Pilot training programs will likely need to be updated to address situations where automated systems fail and pilots must take manual control. The focus will shift to training pilots to regain control in situations where automation locks them out, ensuring they can respond quickly and effectively.
Review of Aircraft Automation Protocols:
Aircraft manufacturers will likely reassess the role of automation systems, particularly during takeoff and climb phases. Systems will need to be adjusted to give pilots more direct control when things go wrong. Enhanced manual override options may be integrated to ensure pilots have the flexibility to intervene in emergencies.
More Rigorous Testing of Automation Systems:
In light of these findings, aviation regulators and manufacturers may impose stricter testing protocols for aircraft automation systems, focusing on how these systems respond in critical situations. Systems will need to be tested under emergency conditions to ensure they don’t inadvertently prevent pilots from taking necessary actions during a failure.
Potential Regulatory Changes:
Regulatory bodies such as the FAA and EASA may introduce new guidelines or requirements for the integration of automation systems in aircraft. These guidelines would likely focus on ensuring that human pilots always retain the final authority over critical systems, especially in high-risk flight phases.
Conclusion: A Wake-Up Call for the Aviation Industry
The revelation that automation systems may have overridden human control during the Air India 171 crash is a stark reminder of the complexities of modern aviation. While automated systems have undeniably made air travel safer and more efficient, this tragedy highlights the risks of over-reliance on technology, especially when systems fail or malfunction.
As investigations continue, it’s clear that the aviation industry must reassess how it balances automation with pilot control to ensure that pilots are never powerless in the face of an emergency. Air India Flight 171 will be remembered as a tragic moment in aviation history, but the lessons learned from this disaster will drive the industry toward safer, more resilient aviation practices for the future.
Our thoughts remain with the victims of Air India Flight 171 and their families. This discovery underscores the need for continual progress in aviation safety to prevent such tragedies from occurring again.
