😱 VIRAL BOMBSHELL! A resurfaced clip of The View’s Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg getting HUMILIATED on-air with a legal note after falsely accusing Charlie Kirk of welcoming neo-Nazis to a Turning Point USA event is blowing up online! 😤 What did they say that forced this rare apology? Is this proof of a bigger agenda? This jaw-dropping moment is sparking outrage everywhere!
🗣️ Share your thoughts—what’s the real story here?
👉 Watch the explosive clip now:
In July 2022, an episode of ABC’s The View became the center of a firestorm when co-hosts Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg falsely claimed that conservative activist Charlie Kirk and his organization, Turning Point USA (TPUSA), had welcomed neo-Nazis to a Student Action Summit in Tampa, Florida. The accusation, made during a heated discussion about political extremism, prompted a swift legal threat from TPUSA, forcing the hosts to read a rare on-air legal note correcting their statements. Now, in the wake of Kirk’s tragic assassination on September 10, 2025, the clip has resurfaced, going viral on platforms like X and YouTube, reigniting debates about media accountability, political bias, and the legacy of a polarizing figure. This moment, as reported by sources like Newsbusters and TheBlaze, serves as a stark reminder of the power of words and the consequences of misinformation.
The Incident That Sparked Outrage
The controversy began during a July 25, 2022, episode of The View, when the panel discussed a TPUSA Student Action Summit held in Tampa. The event, attended by thousands of young conservatives, including high-profile figures like Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, drew attention when a small group of neo-Nazis protested outside, waving swastikas and antisemitic signs. Joy Behar, addressing the protests, claimed that TPUSA had “embraced” the neo-Nazis, stating, “Neo-Nazis were out there in the front of the conference with antisemitic slurs and the Nazi swastika and a picture of a so-called Jewish person with exaggerated features, just like Goebbels did during the Third Reich.” Whoopi Goldberg echoed the sentiment, suggesting Kirk had “invited” these extremists into the event, implying a connection between TPUSA and hate groups.
The claims were explosive, painting Kirk and TPUSA as complicit in far-right extremism. But they were also false. The neo-Nazis were not part of the summit; they were outside protesters, explicitly condemned by TPUSA in a statement released the same day. Kirk himself took to social media, denouncing the group and clarifying that they were not affiliated with his organization. The accusations, however, spread rapidly, amplified by The View’s massive audience and the hosts’ authoritative tone.
The Legal Backlash
TPUSA didn’t let the claims slide. On July 26, 2022, the organization issued a cease-and-desist letter to ABC, accusing Behar and Goldberg of making “false and derogatory statements” that defamed Kirk and TPUSA. The letter, reported by Taphaps.com, demanded an on-air retraction and threatened legal action if the network failed to comply. The pressure worked. Two days later, on July 27, Behar and Goldberg were forced to read a legal note on-air, a rare and humbling moment for the show.
“We want to make clear that these demonstrators were outside the event, and that they were not invited or endorsed by Turning Point USA,” Goldberg read, her tone subdued. Behar followed, noting that TPUSA had condemned the group’s “antisemitic activities” and clarifying that “the views expressed by the individuals outside the event do not reflect the values of the organization.” The correction was brief but significant, acknowledging the falsehood of their earlier claims. The clip, captured and shared by outlets like Newsbusters, became a flashpoint for critics of mainstream media, who argued it exposed a pattern of bias against conservative figures.
The Viral Resurgence
Fast forward to September 2025, following Kirk’s assassination at Utah Valley University, the 2022 clip has resurfaced with a vengeance. Shared by commentators like Dave Rubin of The Rubin Report on YouTube and amplified on X, the video has racked up millions of views, with users hailing it as evidence of media attempts to smear Kirk. “This is why they hated Charlie—he called out their lies,” one X post read, garnering thousands of likes. The timing, coming after Kirk’s death at the hands of 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, has added a layer of poignancy, with many seeing the clip as a testament to the challenges Kirk faced in his career.
The resurfaced clip has also reignited criticism of The View and its hosts. On X, users accused Behar and Goldberg of recklessly fueling division, with one post stating, “They tried to destroy Charlie with lies, and now he’s gone.” Conservative outlets like TheBlaze and The Gateway Pundit have framed the incident as part of a broader pattern of media hostility toward Kirk, pointing to his frequent clashes with progressive commentators. The clip’s viral spread, boosted by hashtags like #TheViewLied and #JusticeForCharlie, has kept the controversy alive, even as The View’s September 11, 2025, episode mourned Kirk’s death with somber reflection.
The Context of Kirk’s Legacy
Charlie Kirk, killed by a single shot during a Turning Point USA event, was a polarizing figure whose influence cannot be understated. His organization mobilized thousands of young conservatives, challenging progressive narratives on college campuses and beyond. Kirk’s outspoken views on issues like immigration, gender identity, and political correctness made him a target for criticism, but also a hero to his supporters. His assassination, labeled a “political assassination” by Governor Spencer Cox, has been linked to ideological motives, with bullet casings inscribed with phrases like “Antifa forever” and “Here fascist! CATCH! Oh bella ciao, ciao, ciao.”
The resurfaced The View clip, viewed in this context, takes on new significance. Kirk’s supporters argue that the 2022 incident was part of a broader effort to vilify him, painting him as an extremist to justify opposition. The legal note, they claim, was a rare moment of accountability for a media landscape often quick to demonize conservatives. “Charlie was always fighting these lies,” Erika Kirk, his widow, said in a statement to Fox News, reflecting on his legacy as a truth-teller in a polarized world.
A Media Reckoning
The viral clip has sparked broader questions about media accountability. Critics argue that The View’s initial claims, made without evidence, reflect a willingness to sensationalize for ratings or ideological gain. The forced retraction, while a correction, did little to undo the initial damage, as the false narrative had already spread widely. On X, users have called for greater scrutiny of mainstream media, with one post stating, “They say whatever they want, then apologize quietly when caught.” The incident has also fueled distrust in outlets perceived as progressive, with conservative commentators like Ben Shapiro citing it as evidence of a “smear machine.”
Progressive voices, however, defend The View’s broader mission, arguing that the hosts were addressing the rise of extremism in good faith. A Reddit thread on the topic suggested that Behar and Goldberg’s comments were based on misinformation about the Tampa event, not malice. Still, the legal note and its viral resurgence have put pressure on the show to address the incident again, especially given Kirk’s tragic death.
A Nation Reflects
The resurfaced clip comes at a time when America is grappling with rising political violence, with Reuters reporting over 300 such incidents since January 6, 2021. Kirk’s assassination, linked to ideological motives, has intensified these concerns, making the 2022 The View incident a poignant reminder of how words can fuel division. The clip’s viral spread has also highlighted the power of social media to hold media accountable, with platforms like X and YouTube amplifying the legal note to millions.
As the nation mourns Kirk, with a memorial planned for September 21 at State Farm Stadium in Arizona, the resurfaced clip serves as a call to reflect on the consequences of misinformation. For Kirk’s supporters, it’s evidence of the battles he fought against a media they see as biased. For others, it’s a reminder of the need for careful reporting in a polarized climate. As the investigation into Kirk’s death continues, with the FBI probing potential accomplices, the legacy of this moment—when The View was forced to retract its claims—will endure as a cautionary tale about truth, accountability, and the high stakes of public discourse.
