12 Years Later, Horror Fans Still Can’t Believe the Sequel to the Highest-Grossing Zombie Movie Ever Made Was Canceled

🚨 12 Years Later, Fans STILL Can’t Believe the Sequel to the Highest-Grossing Zombie Movie Was Canceled 🚨
🧟‍♂️ It’s been over a decade, and horror fans are still reeling. The highly anticipated sequel to the highest-grossing zombie movie ever made was canceled, leaving fans with more questions than answers. Why? What could have been?

World War Z (2013) is an action horror film that stars Brad Pitt as retired UN investigator, Gerald “Gerry” Lane. The film follows Gerry as he’s pulled back into active duty to help uncover a cure for a volatile zombie virus that is quickly spreading across the globe. As far as zombie movies go, World War Z offers fast-paced action and thrills that don’t give the audience much time to breathe. Critics and fans also agree that Brad Pitt delivered a solid performance, making World War Z a memorable entry into the zombie subgenre.

World War Z is regarded as the highest-grossing zombie film ever made. It earned $540 million at the box office, which was more than double its budget, even after the reshoots. Originally, the film had a budget of $125 million. Still, after some setbacks that resulted in the script being revised by several writers and an additional 7 weeks of shooting, the total cost of the film was estimated to be just short of $200 million. World War Z was never meant to be a solo film, but unfortunately, the highly anticipated sequel never got off the ground.

World War Z Director Marc Forster Wanted World War Z to be a Trilogy

Paramount Pictures Allegedly Agreed with Forster’s Desires for 3 Films

Gerry Lane (Brad Pitt) has blood dripping down his face and looks worried as he looks behind himself in World War Z.Image via Paramount Pictures Brad Pitt as Gerald "Gerry" Lane and Daniella Kertesz as "Segen" on an airplane from World War Z (2013)Property of Paramount Pictures A zombie staring at Brad Pitt as Gerald "Gerry" Lane from World War Z (2013)Property of Paramount Pictures A zombie horde attacking a wall in World War Z (2013)Property of Paramount Pictures

The zombie subgenre is flooded with subpar entries, but World War Z is not one of them. The film is based on a 2006 novel of the same name by Max Brooks, and it embraces a lot of modern zombie tropes that reinvigorated the subgenre. The zombies are fast, powerful, and highly aggressive. The film is full of unsettling scenes of zombies literally piling on top of one another, forming a giant mass that allows them to reach just about anywhere. A giant wall designed to keep invaders out isn’t enough to stop World War Z’s undead. They are relentless and deadly, making this zombie virus one of the most aggressive in zombie movie history.

Overall, critics and fans had mostly positive things to say about this fast-paced zombie thriller. Many viewers praised Brad Pitt’s compelling performance as Gerry. Some also claimed that World War Z offered a “true revival” of zombie media and congratulated it for how it truly embraced and showcased the scale of a global pandemic. The film did face some criticism for not being faithful enough to Max Brooks’ World War Z. Some viewers also pointed out that the film ends on a disappointing note that leaving audiences feeling a sense of disappointment at how anti-climactic it was.

Rotten Tomatoes Scores
Tomatometer: 67%, Popcornmeter: 72%

IMDb Rating
7 out of 10 stars

Google User Score
According to Google, 82% of users who weighed in on World War Z claimed to like it.

World War Z’s “anti-climactic ending” can probably be attributed to the fact that director Marc Forster planned on the film being the first installment in a trilogy of films. According to a 2012 Los Angeles Times article, World War Z was going to be Brad Pitt’s chance to have a “big film franchise of his own.” The article also revealed that the World War Z trilogy was supposed to be a mix of The Walking Dead and Jason Bourne.

World War Z as a trilogy that would have the grounded, gun-metal realism of, say, Damon’s Jason Bourne series tethered to the unsettling end-times vibe of AMC’s The Walking Dead.” – L.A. Times

World War Z trilogy would have made a lot of sense. The 2013 film doesn’t feel like a complete story. Instead, it presents itself as the start of a much larger story. It sets the groundwork for Brad Pitt’s character, and it establishes important world-building for World War Z’s take on zombies. It also emphasizes how quickly the outbreak has spread across the globe by having Pitt’s Gerry traverse to multiple locations. As the title of the film implies, this wasn’t just a zombie outbreak; it was a full-on war with the undead. After the financial success of the first film, Paramount Pictures decided it would move ahead with a sequel. Sadly, the World War Z sequel never saw the light of day.

After a Lengthy Pre-production Period, the World War Z Sequel was Canceled

World War Z 2 was Originally Supposed to Hit Theaters in 2017

A zombie screams menacingly in World War Z.

 

World War Z faced some issues during production that resulted in reshoots, a larger budget, and its release date being pushed back from December 2012 to June 2013. Despite the hiccups the film faced, it still managed to make an impressive $540 million worldwide. Since World War Z, no zombie film has managed to beat that record, and the success led Paramount to immediately green-light a second installment. Unfortunately, the sequel faced even more issues before pre-production even started.

Originally, J. A. Bayona was set to direct the sequel. This information surfaced in December 2013. A few months later, in May 2014, Steven Knight was reportedly brought on to write the script. Updates about the project fizzled out after that announcement. Fans didn’t hear much about the World War Z sequel for an entire year, until May 2015. In May, Paramount Pictures announced that World War Z 2 would hit theaters on June 9, 2017, almost four years after the original was released. Early in 2016, Bayona left the project due to scheduling conflicts, leaving the sequel without a director.

David Fincher eventually joined the project to replace Bayona, but he didn’t sign on until 2017. Paramount announced that World War Z’s sequel hadn’t started filming in February 2017, only 10 months before the film was supposed to be released. They pushed the release date back, unsure of whether it would be finished before 2019. Fincher also faced scheduling conflicts because he was working on Mindhunter (2017-2019). The sequel finally entered pre-production towards the end of 2018, but in February 2019, after nearly six years, Paramount Pictures officially canceled the sequel.

There are a few different reasons floating around as to why Paramount finally canceled the film, but the biggest one was likely budget concerns. A 2019 IndieWire article reported that Fincher was going to film the sequel for less than the budget of the original, but considering World War Z cost almost $200 million, that was still a huge financial investment. Other sources have claimed that it was Chinese censorship that forbids media about zombies and other supernatural creatures that finally made Paramount pull the plug.

As disappointing as the cancellation is, some fans have pointed out that it’s probably for the best. World War Z came at an optimal time. The novel was still doing well. Zombie media was in its prime, with AMC’s The Walking Dead in between its third and fourth seasons, and the critically acclaimed survival game, The Last of Us, hitting the shelves. By the time the sequel was canceled, six years had passed. Many fans and critics felt that World War Z’s optimal window had closed, so a sequel likely wouldn’t have done well anyway. The sequel was also going to be extremely similar to The Last of Us, so it’s probably for the best that it didn’t see the light of day. Especially now that Naughty Dog has a sequel game and a successful HBO series adaptation.

Paramount Pictures Could Still Revive World War Z

Despite All the Reasons the Sequel Fell Apart, It’s a Real Shame It Did

Brad Pitt as Gerald "Gerry" Lane, Mireille Enos as Karin Lane, Sterling Jerins as Constance Lane and Abigail Hargrove as Rachel Lane running in a crowd from World War Z (2013)Property of Paramount Pictures

Hollywood is currently experiencing a period where franchises that seemed to be dead and buried have suddenly had revivals. 28 Years Later, another “zombie” movie, is the third installment in the 28 Days Later franchise, which hasn’t seen a new film since 2007, when 28 Weeks Later hit theaters. Beetlejuice Beetlejuice (2024), a Beetlejuice (1988) sequel, came out after 36 years. Other horror movie franchises have been revived by a new installment after years or even decades of not receiving new media, like Final Destination Bloodlines (2025), Scream (2022), I Know What You Did Last Summer (2025), Halloween (2018), and Alien: Romulus (2024). Even Will Smith’s I Am Legend (2007) is finally getting a sequel after almost 20 years.

Some fans might think World War Z’s window has closed for good, but if there was ever a time for an “older” movie to finally get a much-deserved sequel, it’s now. With so many horror franchises reemerging, World War Z would fit right in. Admittedly, this potential sequel should probably avoid The Last of Us plot line it originally planned. World War Z had a unique take on a zombie outbreak, and it presented the world with some of the most deadly zombies ever put to film, so it doesn’t need to mimic another successful series to succeed. It would genuinely be better not to risk being accused of mimicking or copying another popular franchise.

Just because the original sequel’s plot likely wouldn’t work out doesn’t mean that World War Z doesn’t have an incredible foundation to build upon. The original film is solid and delivers some of the scariest modern zombies of the subgenre. It’s almost hard to believe that the sequel fell through the cracks because the first one had so much potential to be something great. It also made an impressive sum of money for a horror film, which indicated that the interest was clearly there.

As someone who went to see World War Z opening weekend and loved it, I was always shocked the film didn’t get a sequel. Yes, Gerry found a way to avoid the zombies’ detection that ultimately led to a vaccine for healthy survivors. Essentially, the zombies would ignore sick or infected individuals because they weren’t suitable carriers for the virus. This made sick individuals more or less invisible to the zombies, allowing them to safely move around infected people. It wasn’t a cure-all for the zombie virus. Injecting someone who had already turned wasn’t going to magically cure them, but it did allow survivors the ability to camouflage themselves, giving them some safety when fighting zombies and evacuating other survivors from major cities.

With the unique zombies, an interesting approach to camouflaging healthy survivors, and a world still overrun by zombies, World War Z’s canceled sequel had a lot to offer. Even now, 12 years after the movie hit theaters, I still find myself disappointed that the plans for a trilogy never saw the light of day. The original film didn’t wrap everything up in a neat little bow, leaving so much room for growth. Now that so much time has passed, a sequel could focus on years in the future, as the war on zombies is still in full swing, and how survivors have adapted over the years. Unfortunately, budget concerns and pre-production Hell derailed this film franchise for good, but I still have hope that we might still get that sequel someday.

Related Posts

Our Privacy policy

https://grownewsus.com - © 2025 News