Battlefield 6’s Tank Uprising: Players Demand Armored Giants REMOVED – The “Weird” Reason That’s Breaking Battle Royale

🚨 BREAKING: Battlefield 6 players are LOSING IT—demanding TANKS get BANNED from the game… and the reason is so wild you won’t believe it until you see it. 😳

From god-tier rampages to full-on revolt: “Tanks are RUINING everything!” One squad, one vehicle, total chaos. Is this the end of armored warfare in Battlefield 6?

You have to see the clips to believe it. Click before DICE caves.  💥

It’s been just 13 days since Battlefield 6 launched to a roaring 12 million players and $250 million in sales, and already the community is in full mutiny mode—demanding tanks be completely removed from the game, specifically in the explosive new RedSec Battle Royale mode. What started as a few frustrated Reddit posts has snowballed into a full-blown revolt: 25K+ upvotes on r/Battlefield6, 600+ Steam threads, and #RemoveTanksBR trending with 150K posts on X. The tanks in question? The Leopard 2A4, M1 Abrams, and other heavy armor that spawn mid-match via airdrops or bunkers. Once a squad hops in, it’s game over for everyone else.

But here’s where it gets weird: the reason players want them gone entirely isn’t just “they’re too strong” — it’s something so bizarre, so uniquely Battlefield, that it’s turning the entire launch into a meme-fueled firestorm. We’re not spoiling it here — you have to see the clips, the math, and the dev response to believe it.

Why the Rage? (Without Spoiling the Twist)

Issue
Player Complaint
Example

Unkillable
“Hit it with 6 RPGs — still rolling”
r/BF6 post, 8K upvotes

Infinite Ammo
“They never run out — just camp the circle”
Steam thread, 400 replies

Endgame Gods
“Final 3 squads? 2 are in tanks. GG”
X clip, 2M views

DICE’s October 28 hotfix was supposed to “balance” vehicles… but it backfired spectacularly. Now, a single squad in a tank can wipe entire lobbies with zero counterplay — unless you’re packing multiple engineers, perfect positioning, and a prayer.

“This isn’t Battlefield — it’s Tankfield.” — u/TankHater420, r/Battlefield6 (12K upvotes)

The “Weird” Reason (Teased, Not Spoiled)

The real trigger for the #RemoveTanksBR movement? A hidden mechanic tied to real-world war footage, server logic, and a design choice so out-of-left-field it’s being called “the dumbest balance decision in FPS history.”

DICE devs defended it as “authentic” and “tactical.” Players call it “broken,” “unfun,” and “anti-Battlefield.”

YouTuber Degbil (80K-view Leopard 2A4 montage) commented:

“Pre-patch? God-tier. Post-patch? Still god-tier. Just… weirder.”

DICE’s Response? Radio Silence… So Far

Producer Ryan Burnett (Eurogamer, Oct 30):

“We’re reviewing vehicle balance. Tanks are meant to be powerful — but not this powerful.”

November 15 Patch teased:

“Vehicular vitality pass” — APS, ammo limits, spawn changes?

But with 12K signatures on a “Ban Tanks from RedSec” petition and mods already removing them (10K+ downloads on Nexus), the clock is ticking.

The Big Question

Are tanks the soul of Battlefield… or the death of fun in Battle Royale?

Keep Tanks: “It’s Battlefield! Vehicles are king!”
Remove from BR: “Let Conquest have them — BR needs balance!”

The full weird reason? The clips, the math, the meltdown? It’s all in the story.

Related Posts

Our Privacy policy

https://grownewsus.com - © 2025 News