🚨 MH370 BREAKTHROUGH: “I’VE GOT PROOF!” RESEARCHER’S CLAIM ROCKS THE WORLD! 🚨
For 11 years, the mystery of Malaysian Flight 370 has haunted us—until now. Richard Godfrey says he’s cracked it, pinpointing the lost plane’s exact location with evidence that’s blowing minds! 😱 What did he find buried in the data? Could this finally solve the fate of 239 souls? Click to uncover the stunning truth that’s got everyone talking! 👇

On March 8, 2014, Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, a Boeing 777 with 239 passengers and crew, vanished en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing, cementing its place as one of aviation’s greatest unsolved mysteries. Despite searches costing over $150 million and spanning vast stretches of the southern Indian Ocean, the plane’s wreckage remained elusive, with only fragments like a wing flaperon offering clues. Now, in September 2025, retired aerospace engineer Richard Godfrey claims to have pinpointed MH370’s location with “proof” that’s stunned the world. Let’s dive into Godfrey’s bold claim, the technology behind it, the history of the search, and what this means for a case that’s gripped the globe for over a decade, while weighing whether his evidence holds up or adds to the speculation.

What Happened to MH370?

MH370 departed Kuala Lumpur International Airport at 12:41 AM, headed for Beijing with 227 passengers, mostly Chinese, and 12 crew members. Everything seemed normal until 1:07 AM, when the Aircraft Communication Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) sent its final transmission. At 1:19 AM, Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah signed off with, “Good night, Malaysian Three Seven Zero.” By 1:21 AM, the transponder was switched off, and the plane vanished from secondary radar near Vietnamese airspace. Malaysian military radar later tracked it turning southwest over the Malay Peninsula, then northwest over the Strait of Malacca, before it disappeared over the Andaman Sea at 2:22 AM. Inmarsat satellite data showed the plane flew for nearly seven hours, likely crashing along the “seventh arc” in the southern Indian Ocean.

The Search: Years of Dead Ends

The initial search targeted the South China Sea but shifted to the southern Indian Ocean after Inmarsat’s data pointed to the seventh arc. Australia spearheaded a multinational effort from March 17, 2014, covering 120,000 square kilometers southwest of Perth at a cost of over $150 million. Advanced sonar, submersibles, and sonobuoys scoured the ocean floor, but no wreckage was found. Between 2015 and 2017, debris washed up on Réunion Island, Madagascar, and African coasts, with a flaperon confirmed as MH370’s in July 2015, but it didn’t reveal the crash site. Ocean Infinity’s 2018 private search, under a “no find, no fee” model, also came up empty. The official search was halted in January 2017, with Malaysia, Australia, and China agreeing to resume only with credible new evidence.

In March 2025, Ocean Infinity launched a new search covering 15,000 square kilometers, backed by a $70 million Malaysian contract. Suspended in April due to seasonal conditions, it’s set to resume by late 2025. Godfrey’s claim, emerging in this context, suggests his findings may guide this effort.

Godfrey’s Breakthrough: WSPR Technology

Richard Godfrey, a retired British aerospace engineer and member of the MH370 Independent Group, claims to have located the plane using Weak Signal Propagation Reporter (WSPR) technology. WSPR, used by amateur radio operators, detects signal disturbances caused by objects like aircraft. Godfrey says his analysis of WSPR data from March 8, 2014, tracks MH370 to a crash site at 29.128°S, 99.934°E, about 1,560 kilometers west of Perth, Australia, at a 4,000-meter depth. He argues this aligns with Inmarsat data, Boeing performance metrics, and University of Western Australia drift studies of debris.

In his 2023 report, co-authored with Hannes Coetzee and Professor Simon Maskell, Godfrey detailed 67 positions over six hours, using 125 anomalous WSPR links. He compares WSPR to “tripwires” detecting aircraft, validated through blind trials tracking Qantas flights. His bold statement—“It will only take one more search, and we will find MH370”—has sparked global attention.

Does Godfrey’s Proof Hold Up?

Godfrey’s claim is intriguing but divisive. WSPR is not designed for aircraft tracking, and critics like Jeff Wise, host of the Deep Dive MH370 podcast, call it unreliable for this purpose. A 2022 YouTube analysis by sk999 labeled WSPR’s use “absurd,” citing its sensitivity to atmospheric conditions and low signal-to-noise ratio. The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) acknowledged Godfrey’s work in 2022 but admitted it lacked the expertise to validate WSPR data. Part of Godfrey’s proposed crash site overlaps with the ATSB’s 2014-2017 search area, where no wreckage was found, raising doubts about his precision.

Godfrey’s history of inaccuracies, such as claiming an Emirates pilot spotted MH370 or misstating Ocean Infinity’s search vessels, undermines his credibility. His crash site aligns with Captain Shah’s home simulator data, which the FBI dismissed, adding intrigue but not proof. The sensational claim of “proof” may reflect Godfrey’s conviction or a push for funding, but without physical wreckage or official validation, it’s speculative. The southern Indian Ocean’s rugged terrain—deep trenches and volcanic ridges—further complicates verification.

Competing Theories and Search Challenges

The MH370 mystery has fueled numerous theories. The 2018 Malaysian report confirmed manual diversion, likely by Shah or a third party, but found no definitive cause. Pilot suicide theories, supported by Shah’s simulator data mimicking a southern Indian Ocean path, lack clear motive. Hijacking scenarios, like Jeff Wise’s Russian operative theory, are less credible, with debris analysis ruling out a controlled landing. Mechanical failure is unlikely, given the plane’s extended flight post-diversion.

Other researchers offer alternative locations. Vincent Lyne, from the University of Tasmania, suggests MH370 lies in a 20,000-foot-deep “hole” in the Broken Ridge, possibly chosen for a deliberate ditching. Cardiff University’s 2024 hydrophone study proposed acoustic signals could pinpoint the crash, but its application to MH370 is untested. These competing claims underscore the difficulty of separating credible leads from speculation in a case with limited physical evidence.

The Human Toll

MH370’s disappearance left 239 families in anguish, with two-thirds of the passengers being Chinese. Relatives, like Grace Nathan, who lost her mother, have campaigned tirelessly, with protests at Malaysia’s Beijing embassy. The tragedy’s global impact—passengers from 14 countries—prompted aviation reforms, including better flight tracking, as recommended in the 2017 Australian report. A confirmed crash site could offer closure, but false hopes risk deepening the pain.

Current Efforts and Next Steps

Ocean Infinity’s 2025 search, using advanced underwater robots capable of scanning 6,000-meter depths, is informed by analyses like Godfrey’s. Malaysian Transport Minister Anthony Loke has vowed to keep the case open, with the $70 million contract reflecting cautious optimism. Recovering the black boxes could reveal why MH370 diverted and crashed, potentially validating or debunking Godfrey’s claim. The Indian Ocean’s vastness remains a formidable barrier, with depths and currents hiding wreckage for years.

Weighing the Evidence

Godfrey’s claim taps into a universal longing for answers but demands scrutiny. WSPR’s unconventional use raises skepticism, and his track record of inaccuracies tempers trust. The alignment with Inmarsat and drift data is promising, but without wreckage, it’s not conclusive. Sensational headlines may boost interest or funding but risk misleading families. Collaborative efforts, like Ocean Infinity’s, combining multiple data sources, are more likely to succeed than individual claims.

Looking Ahead

The mystery of MH370, which claimed 239 lives, continues to captivate and haunt. Godfrey’s assertion of proof offers hope, but the southern Indian Ocean’s challenges demand patience. As Ocean Infinity’s search resumes, the world watches for physical evidence to confirm claims like Godfrey’s. Until wreckage is found, the fate of MH370 remains an open wound, a reminder of aviation’s limits and the enduring quest for truth.