Devastating wildfires have swept through Los Angeles, leaving countless people displaced. Amid this tragedy, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry made an appearance at a food bank to offer aid. On the surface, it sounds like a commendable gesture. But as with most things Sussex-related, the situation quickly spiraled into controversy.

Meghan Markle arrived at the Pasadena Convention Center in a carefully curated “casual” look—light blue shirt, baseball cap—designed to appear relatable. While her intention to help was clear, it wasn’t long before critics started questioning her motives.

During a FOX LA broadcast, anchor Susan Hirasuna referred to her as “Princess Meghan,” sparking immediate debate. Observers pointed out that Meghan is not technically a princess and has repeatedly been accused of using royal titles for publicity.

Let’s break it down: Meghan and Harry stepped back from their royal roles in 2020. With that decision came the understanding they wouldn’t use their titles for commercial or public gain. Yet, here we are.

It’s impossible to ignore the stark differences between Meghan’s approach and how other royals, like Princess Catherine, conduct themselves. Catherine consistently embodies quiet dignity and genuine compassion in her public engagements. She doesn’t need cameras or titles to validate her efforts.

For example, when the Princess of Wales supports causes, her actions speak for themselves. She champions mental health, early childhood education, and environmental sustainability without fanfare or drama. It’s a testament to what true royalty looks like—service, grace, and humility.

As Meghan and Harry’s food bank appearance gained attention, so did public skepticism. Social media lit up with comments questioning the couple’s motivations. Critics pointed out the presence of cameras, the highly publicized nature of the visit, and the couple’s history of media-focused initiatives.

Even Los Angeles Mayor Victor Gordo, who praised their generosity, mentioned their previous “anonymous” visit to serve food. But with a full camera crew in tow, how “anonymous” could it really have been?

And then there’s the timing. This appearance coincided with King Charles III’s recent crackdown on the use of royal titles. Coincidence? Critics think not.

At the heart of the issue is a question of intent. Real philanthropy doesn’t need press releases or public recognition. Princess Diana, for example, often visited hospitals and shelters in secret, prioritizing the cause over the coverage.In contrast, Meghan and Harry’s actions seem meticulously orchestrated. From carefully staged photo ops to publicized statements about opening their Montecito mansion to evacuees, it’s hard to ignore the calculated nature of their efforts.

This isn’t just about one appearance at a food bank. It’s about respect for an institution that has endured for centuries. The monarchy is built on duty and service—not self-promotion.

King Charles’ recent efforts to enforce royal protocols are a step in the right direction. The monarchy’s survival depends on its ability to maintain tradition and dignity, something the Sussexes seem to overlook